Re: [RFC] fallocate utility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:27:57PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I was thinking the new fallocate util would have the
> same options as the existing truncate util.
> I.E. -n or -o would not be needed or supportable in all situations.
> If you think that users would need those, then I suggest
> adding the linux specific fallocate util to util-linux-ng,
> and we'll add the more generic `truncate --allocate`
> (or separate command) to coreutils.

 So.. what is our final conclusion? The Linux specific fallocate(1) in
 util-linux-ng, right? Everyone agrees?

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux