Re: [RFC] fallocate utility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Pádraig Brady schrieb:
>> I don't see a problem in extending the meaning of the truncate command.
>> Now truncate isn't the best name for the command but that name
>> already existed in BSD and so I thought it best to align with that.
>> So what about also having an fallocate command in coreutils?
>> Well it would benefit from all the existing options of the truncate command,
>> I.E. would share most of the code, so I'm not convinced.
> 
> Why not make it, in the best Unix tradition, a single
> executable whose action depends on the name it is run as?

Hmm. Good idea.
There is precedent for that already in coreutils.

cheers,
Pádraig.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux