Re: [PATCH] of: fix reproducible node name for legacy vs. new partition binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sascha,

> > 1. [x] of_partition_binding=new in barebox and barebox-state in Linux is working.
> > 2. [ ] set of_partition_binding=legacy in barebox and barebox-state in Linux fails.
> > 3. [x] apply the patch and rebuild and install barebox
> > 4. [x] set of_partition_binding=legacy and barebox-state in Linux is working again \o/.
> > 
> > Is this test sufficient?
> > If not what are other usefull testcases?
> 
> Thanks for testing.

You are welcome, thanks you for this important patch!

> 
> Another test would be if you use the legacy binding in your barebox
> devicetree and then set of_partition_binding=new. Without this patch it
> should fail in Linux and with it it should work. That's the less
> important case though.
> 

Understood. Unfortunately I do not have time to test this immediately.

Because state-framework is essential for RAUC and must not break in field, we plan to integrate tests of state-framework 
into our jenkins/labgrid. We will try to consider your testcase there.

@Jonathan: If you are back in office please remind me to talk about including this state-framework tests. Feel free to
update the task (or simply implement it :) )

Regards
Gavin
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux