Hi Gavin, On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:07:45AM +0000, Schenk, Gavin wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 10:47 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > the of_reproducible_name mechanism is used to find a partition node > > from the barebox devicetree in the Linux devicetree. Unfortunately > > we have two different partition bindings. In the legacy one the partition > > nodes are directly under the hardware devicenode whereas in the new > > binding the partitions are under an additional partitions subnode. > > This means we get two different (not so) reproducible names when > > the barebox devicetree uses the legacy binding and the Linux devicetree > > uses the new binding (or the other way round). To get the same > > name then for these cases we drop the partitions subnode from the > > reproducible name. > > > > This makes the partition fixup in barebox-state work when the barebox > > devicetree uses another binding than the Linux devicetree. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Ulrich Ölmann <u.oelmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Gavin Schenk <g.schenk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > What I did to test it: > > 1. [x] of_partition_binding=new in barebox and barebox-state in Linux is working. > 2. [ ] set of_partition_binding=legacy in barebox and barebox-state in Linux fails. > 3. [x] apply the patch and rebuild and install barebox > 4. [x] set of_partition_binding=legacy and barebox-state in Linux is working again \o/. > > Is this test sufficient? > If not what are other usefull testcases? Thanks for testing. Another test would be if you use the legacy binding in your barebox devicetree and then set of_partition_binding=new. Without this patch it should fail in Linux and with it it should work. That's the less important case though. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
