On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:50:30PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 06/13/13 14:48, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:38:19AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>On 06/13/13 11:25, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >>>Sounds like a plan. Functions existing both in barebox and Linux should > >>>behave the same way. However, if Linux turns out to do something silly > >>>or (for our usecase) too bloated, we shouldn't do the same just because > >>>Linux does it. > > Sascha, > > pushed a branch you can have a first look at to > > git://github.com/shesselba/barebox-dove.git of-sync-v1 I had a quick look at this branch. It has some really good stuff in it. You should post it for a closer review if you consider it ready. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
