On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:38:19AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 06/13/13 11:25, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:33:06AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>I started merging already, and from what I can see we should just remove > >>the spinlocks and OF_DYNAMIC stuff (but leave of_node_get/_put as stubs) > > > >Sounds like a plan. Functions existing both in barebox and Linux should > >behave the same way. However, if Linux turns out to do something silly > >or (for our usecase) too bloated, we shouldn't do the same just because > >Linux does it. > > > >I want to keep the Linux list usage in the devicetree, so they won't be > >really in sync. > > Ok, I started converting and doing it in a clean way is kind of tricky. > > First of all, allyesconfig doesn't build - so it is hard to find and > re-build all users of current of_* functions. > > If you want to stick with list usage, it will end up with converting > instead of just move current functions out of the way, import Linux > OF, and switch users to that functions. > > I will have a look at it, find users/abusers of current API and see > how much we can merge. > > You also want to stick with of_set_* and friends within base.c or > move them out to some other source file where all set/modify functions > will sit in? I'm fine with moving the set/modify kernel to another file, no problem. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
