On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:20:45PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > just for fun, i configured and built MLO and barebox.bin for the > > panda, then tried to use that on a panda ES -- got no response > > whatever from minicom. i did verify that i could boot to barebox just > > fine on a regular panda, though. > > > > this is different from the case of a regular beagle and beagle xM, > > for which the MLO and barebox.bin boot just fine on an xM, so there's > > clearly a significant difference between those two panda variants as > > far as barebox is concerned. i haven't had any time to look at it in > > more detail yet. > > We should add some information about that here: > > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=boards:texas_instruments_panda > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=boards:texas_instruments_beagle > > So what variants of these boards are out there? > > Panda 'regular' > Panda ES > Beagle 'regular' > Beagle xM > > Do these correspond somehow to the revisions printed on the board? > I have a Beagle rev C3 and a Panda rev A1. i'll write something up and ask the beagle & panda lists to take a look. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
