On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:20:45PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > just for fun, i configured and built MLO and barebox.bin for the > panda, then tried to use that on a panda ES -- got no response > whatever from minicom. i did verify that i could boot to barebox just > fine on a regular panda, though. > > this is different from the case of a regular beagle and beagle xM, > for which the MLO and barebox.bin boot just fine on an xM, so there's > clearly a significant difference between those two panda variants as > far as barebox is concerned. i haven't had any time to look at it in > more detail yet. We should add some information about that here: http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=boards:texas_instruments_panda http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=boards:texas_instruments_beagle So what variants of these boards are out there? Panda 'regular' Panda ES Beagle 'regular' Beagle xM Do these correspond somehow to the revisions printed on the board? I have a Beagle rev C3 and a Panda rev A1. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
