Nick Koretsky wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2017 04:42:12 -0400 > Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> >> seems to describe what you are actually after, but I'm not sure I >> >> understand what you are after, other than avoiding the screen locking >> >> problem that I'm not finding here. I know I'm using one Xorg "screen", >> >> and don't think I understand what problem multiple Xorg "screens" >> >> would solve for you. -- >> >> > Each screen has its own coordinate system, so it avoids all problems >> > stemming from "0:0 is an upper left corner always". The tradeoff is >> > that you cant move windows between screens. >> >> I don't understand what trouble '0:0 upper left corner always' creates. >> My screenshot's "HDTV" is at 0,0 left of my 1920x1200 at 1920,0 to match >> the room physics, so mouse on session start moved left goes left, moved >> right goes right, moved down hits menu starter, panel is on right screen, >> I can move apps between screens and have windows straddle screens. ??? > > > I explained that to your once, but you seems to have missed it :) > > This not a big problem when you screen setup is permanent, there could be > some problems with fullscreen games but nothing critical, but as soon as > you want you additional, sometimes off sometimes on, monitor to be left > one everything goes bonkers. Because every time you connect/disconnect it > display coordinates of you main (right) monitor change. And that means > that all windows with pinned positions and all maximized windows starts > jumping around, you can no longer force programs to start at certain > position because that position is different depending on whenever second > display is connected or not. > > > Perhaps my knowledge is outdated, but AFAIR one card - one screen. Even if the PC has multiple outputs - they are mapped to monitors in Xorg. Dual-head cards - can be using 2 screens or two cards in PC etc, however I never had to use one. Your statement is partially true regarding positioning. It is true only if the coordinates are falling outside of the active monitor. I still think you or we are mixing up the terminology here. I now checked few documents again and find out that my understanding was also partial https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/multihead Note: The terms used in this article are very specific to avoid confusion: Monitor refers to a physical display device, such as an LCD panel. Screen refers to an X-Window screen (that is: a monitor attached to a display). Display refers to a collection of screens that are in use at the same time showing parts of a single desktop (you can drag windows among all screens in a single display). I also do not understand your problem completely. For example I have a monitor attached to two pcs. if I switch to the other pc and switch back - programs are still where they were. If I unplug or disable the monitor via xrandr. Programs are moved to the active monitor and resized/squeezed whatever. I have no problem with this as I understand that the software is trying its best to match the new available size of the monitor (resolution) etc. This is also interesting: https://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/MultiMonitorDesktop/ There were a lot of interesting things around wayland. regards --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
