Re: TDE with Debian Bullseye

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 26 of July 2021 05:55:16 Mike Bird via tde-devels wrote:
> Debian Bullseye is in deep freeze and scheduled for release 08/14.
>
> Often I wait until after release but this happened to be a good weekend
> for me to start testing Bullseye.  The non-TDE parts went much smoother
> than usual.  The only minor difficulty thus far was switching routing
> from Quagga to FRR.
>
> I see there's a TDE Bullseye version in trinity-sb.  However if I test
> this I'd like to get back onto TDE stable as soon as possible.
>
> Any thoughts please on if I try trinity-sb/bullseye how much time or
> how difficult will it be to get back to TDE stable with Bullseye?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Mike
> ____________________________________________________

Hi Mike,

as mentioned in previous answers, there are several options. I'll try to 
summarize options and plans:

1. Final release R14.0.11 is planned for the end of October 2021. So here 
comes the primary question whether this is acceptable soon for you so that 
you could switch to PSB repository until then? After release R14.0.11 
switching from PSB to stable will be simple - just make a change URL 
in "sources.list".

2. If it seems too late, there is a question whether it seems like a good 
idea to consider build R14.0.10 packages when Bullseye will be finally 
released?

3. Here, the way would be to "mix the version of distribution". The key 
package that causes a conflict when using Buster packages in Bullseye is 
the "libr0" package, which requires a specific version of the binutils. 
Because this package is very separate, you would be able to manually 
install this package for Bullseye from PSB. Unfortunately, there are 
several other conflicts (libilmbase23, libopenexr23) that require some 
other packages (tdelibs and some tdebase packages) for Bullsey from PSB. 
Some other conflicts can occur for some other packages - such as Kaffeine. 
So this way seems too complicated and with an uncertain result.

So now it is essential, what your opinion is for question 1.

Cheers
-- 
Slávek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

____________________________________________________
tde-devels mailing list -- devels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devels-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/devels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Users]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [KDE]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux