On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 01:01 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sudden changes in behavior that we don't have a good reason for are always > a bad thing. Agreed. But if the missing LU RESET response would be a change that has been introduced by this patch series then I expect that only a small change will be needed to bring that response back. Whether or not a response is sent for a command or TMF that has been aborted is controlled by a single variable (send_abort_response). If we would not be able to figure out the root cause before the v4.11 merge window opens this is something we can still address after this patch series went upstream. Bart.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
