Re: [PATCH v2 00/36] SCSI target patches for kernel v4.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 19:16:13 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:

> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 20:10 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote:
> > Current master - the REPORT_SUPPORTED_OPCODES skip can be ignored...
> > the full test name needs a prefix:
> > --test=ALL.iSCSITMF.LUNResetSimpleAsync
> > or
> > iSCSI.iSCSITMF.LUNResetSimpleAsync  
> 
> Even if I run that test a few hundred times in a loop "echo w >
> /proc/sysrq-trigger" still doesn't report a lockup. I would appreciate it if
> you could provide me sufficient information to reproduce the behavior you
> reported.

But do you see the stuck core_tmr_lun_reset and
iscsit_cause_connection_reinstatement threads?

I could have worded my report better. The "lockup" I was referring to
was the initiator awaiting TMF response and never getting one - which
doesn't happen with mainline.

This is easiest to reproduce with:
iscsi-test-cu --test=ALL.iSCSITMF.LUNResetSimpleAsync ...
and then
iscsi-test-cu --test=ALL.MultipathIO.Reset ... (you'll need to provide
						your IQN twice for MPIO)

If you run MultipathIO.Reset before iSCSITMF.LUNResetSimpleAsync then
it runs fine (ignoring the test failure), if you run it afterwards then
it blocks indefinitely, as LIO never sends a TMF response.

Cheers, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux