Re: commits for stable 2024-05-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 06:35:05PM -0400, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 8:21 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 09:13:25PM -0400, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> > > Please find attached a report generated by keyword matching commits
> > > from upstream that may be suitable for stable and probably as CVEs as
> > > well.
> >
> > This is great, thanks for looking into this and sending this out!
> >
> > > I exclude commits that are already tagged with CC stable in upstream
> > > and also commits already in
> > > stable/linux-rolling-stable.
> >
> > I took a very short look, and just picked one commit at random on the
> > bottom of the list:
> >         cf2df0080bd59cb97a15
> >
> > And it's included in 6.8.2 already, as commit `0 ("wifi:
> > ath11k: fix a possible dead lock caused by ab->base_lock").
> >
> > So is your tooling working?
> 
> Thankyou.
> Ah, the marking of which upstream commit that stable uses is not consistent.
> That one (and another ~150) used the form :
> "^    [ Upstream commit cf2df0080bd59cb97a1519ddefaf59788febdaa5 ]"
> and my regex did not accept that.
> I have changed the regex to be more permissive in detecting what is a
> reference to an upstream commit
> and it should be detecting this varient correctly now.
> 
> 
> >
> > Also, give us a chance to catch up on commits that are in Linus's tree,
> > but not in a -rc release, which you list a few at the top of the list.
> > We aren't allowed to apply them until after they hit a -rc release.
> 
> I see.
> So we should not backporting anything more recent than the most recent
> tag in upstream master?
> Ok. I have done that change to fix that.
> 
> Please find attached a new version of the report.
> I also change the format slightly on how the commits are listed so
> that it IMO becomes easier to read
> and check for specific types of hits.
> 
> I have attached an updated scan with
> 1, fix for being more tolerant when detecting commit references
> 2, stops scanning at the most recent tag in upstream master
> 
> Once this format of the report is in a good shape and we sort out all
> the bugs in it
> I can set it up to scan and automatically post to the list once a week or so.

Thanks, I'll look at this later this week after this latest round of -rc
releases are out.

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux