Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] io_uring: fix registered files leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/14/24 9:55 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> On 24/03/13 06:40PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> OK, here they are. Two patches attached for every stable kernel, that
>> gets rid of the remnants of the SCM related code:
>>
>> 5.4
>> 5.10 and 5.15 (same patches)
>> 6.1
>> 6.6
>> 6.7
>>
>> Would appreciate if Fedor and Pavel could give them a once over, but I
>> think they are all fine. It's just deleting the code...
> 
> Thank you, Jens!
> 
> FWIW, I think it's all good and it eliminates the reported problem
> obviously. Compiled and tested the repro with my kernel config.

Great, thanks for checking!

> Just a minor notice - stable rules declare two common ways for upstream
> patch mentioning in backports [1]. And the first one starts from
> lowercase. No big deal here definitely but maybe somebody has some
> handling of these two variants - by regexps or similar, I actually don't
> know. But I see in the git history that Greg also applies the variant
> you've used.

Honestly that doesn't matter, as long as the upstream commit is
referenced. I always do it this way, not my first stable rodeo.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux