On 3/12/24 9:14 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On 24/03/12 08:34AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 3/12/24 8:23 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > [...] > >>> I feel io_uring-SCM related code should be dropped entirely from the >>> stable branches as the backports already differ greatly between versions >>> and some parts are still kept, some have been dropped in a non-consistent >>> order. Though this might contradict with stable kernel rules or be >>> inappropriate for some other reason. >> >> Looks fine to me, and I agree, it makes much more sense to drop it all >> from 5.10/5.15-stable as well to keep them in sync with upstream. And I >> think this is fine for stable, dropping code is always a good thing. >> > > Alright, got it. So that would require dropping it from all of the > supported 5.4, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7, too. > > Would it be okay if I'll send this as a series? Yeah I think so, keeping the code more in sync is always a good thing when it comes to stable. Just make sure you mark the backport commits with the appropriate upstream shas. Thanks! -- Jens Axboe
