On 3/12/24 9:21 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/12/24 9:14 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: >> On 24/03/12 08:34AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 3/12/24 8:23 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> I feel io_uring-SCM related code should be dropped entirely from the >>>> stable branches as the backports already differ greatly between versions >>>> and some parts are still kept, some have been dropped in a non-consistent >>>> order. Though this might contradict with stable kernel rules or be >>>> inappropriate for some other reason. >>> >>> Looks fine to me, and I agree, it makes much more sense to drop it all >>> from 5.10/5.15-stable as well to keep them in sync with upstream. And I >>> think this is fine for stable, dropping code is always a good thing. >>> >> >> Alright, got it. So that would require dropping it from all of the >> supported 5.4, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7, too. >> >> Would it be okay if I'll send this as a series? > > Yeah I think so, keeping the code more in sync is always a good thing > when it comes to stable. Just make sure you mark the backport commits > with the appropriate upstream shas. Thanks! I'll just do these backports myself, thanks for bringing it up. -- Jens Axboe
