On 24/03/12 08:34AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/12/24 8:23 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: [...] > > I feel io_uring-SCM related code should be dropped entirely from the > > stable branches as the backports already differ greatly between versions > > and some parts are still kept, some have been dropped in a non-consistent > > order. Though this might contradict with stable kernel rules or be > > inappropriate for some other reason. > > Looks fine to me, and I agree, it makes much more sense to drop it all > from 5.10/5.15-stable as well to keep them in sync with upstream. And I > think this is fine for stable, dropping code is always a good thing. > Alright, got it. So that would require dropping it from all of the supported 5.4, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7, too. Would it be okay if I'll send this as a series? -- Fedor
