Roland Fritz schrieb: > > Roland Fritz schrieb: >> >> Paul Lesniewski schrieb: >>> On Dec 18, 2007 3:08 AM, <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 03:18 schrieb Paul Lesniewski: >>>> >>>> > 1) The fact that appending sent messages to the sent folder does not >>>> > work does NOT mean you are left without webmail >>>> >>>> Well... not being able to reply to a mail without getting an error and >>>> getting logged out isn't excatly my definition of "working as >>>> expected" (when you're using imapproxy the left frame will throw an >>>> error as well and you have to wait till the session expires before the >>>> webmail-interface is usable again). >>>> >>>> Anyhow, Roland pointed me to the "auto_expunge" option, which, when >>>> disabled, solves the problem for the moment. It'd be nice to have >>>> auto-expunge back, though. >>>> >>>> > 2) "Frankly said", it is "quite annoying" that your attitude is as >>>> if >>>> > you are a paying customer and the SM team owes you something. >>>> Please >>>> > see: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>>> >>>> Sorry if I sounded like a dick here. English is a foreign language for >>>> me and what was meant slightly ironic obviously came over rather >>>> offensive. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>>> Point is: there is the announcement saying to upgrade to 1.4.13 >>>> immediately if you're using 1.4.12 (for obvious reasons) or 1.4.11 (no >>>> reasons given). Trouble is, 1.4.13 doesn't work (see above), but I >>> >>> 1.4.13 DOES work. Your IMAP server, however, may need to be upgraded. >>> I'm not sure you can lay all the "blame" at SM's doorstep and be so >>> "annoyed". >>> >>>> can't switch to back 1.4.11 either because I don't know what's wrong >>>> with this version (Has it been compromised as well? Does this apply to >>>> the archive I downloaded several weeks ago?). So I had no choice but >>>> to >>>> take it offline, and then there were 70 users at my door complaining >>>> why they can't access their mail. >>>> >>>> I think you'll agree when I say that this is annoying. I'm not in a >>>> position to demand a solution, but I could really need some help. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Roland the webmailer is online again at least. >>>> >>>> Now what can I do to help you (=whoever knows Squirrelmail and IMAP >>>> well >>>> enough) sort out the EXPUNGE-bug? >>> >>> A patch was already posted on this very thread. Please let us know if >>> it does or does not help. >> >> just tried the patch, no difference. > > UPDATE: > when disabling the line 'sqimap_mailbox_select($imapConnection, > $mailbox);', everything works even without the patch. Why is this > statement needed? Next line the replied-to message is fetched but also > with specifying the mailbox: > '$reply_message = sqimap_get_message($imapConnection, $reply_id, > $mailbox);' Sry, my fault, I had the whole section disabled... without the mailbox select it's definitely not working... I shouldn't test when in hurry ;) ROland. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
