Roland Fritz schrieb: > > Paul Lesniewski schrieb: >> On Dec 18, 2007 3:08 AM, <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 03:18 schrieb Paul Lesniewski: >>> >>> > 1) The fact that appending sent messages to the sent folder does not >>> > work does NOT mean you are left without webmail >>> >>> Well... not being able to reply to a mail without getting an error and >>> getting logged out isn't excatly my definition of "working as >>> expected" (when you're using imapproxy the left frame will throw an >>> error as well and you have to wait till the session expires before the >>> webmail-interface is usable again). >>> >>> Anyhow, Roland pointed me to the "auto_expunge" option, which, when >>> disabled, solves the problem for the moment. It'd be nice to have >>> auto-expunge back, though. >>> >>> > 2) "Frankly said", it is "quite annoying" that your attitude is as if >>> > you are a paying customer and the SM team owes you something. Please >>> > see: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>> >>> Sorry if I sounded like a dick here. English is a foreign language for >>> me and what was meant slightly ironic obviously came over rather >>> offensive. >> >> Thanks. >> >>> Point is: there is the announcement saying to upgrade to 1.4.13 >>> immediately if you're using 1.4.12 (for obvious reasons) or 1.4.11 (no >>> reasons given). Trouble is, 1.4.13 doesn't work (see above), but I >> >> 1.4.13 DOES work. Your IMAP server, however, may need to be upgraded. >> I'm not sure you can lay all the "blame" at SM's doorstep and be so >> "annoyed". >> >>> can't switch to back 1.4.11 either because I don't know what's wrong >>> with this version (Has it been compromised as well? Does this apply to >>> the archive I downloaded several weeks ago?). So I had no choice but to >>> take it offline, and then there were 70 users at my door complaining >>> why they can't access their mail. >>> >>> I think you'll agree when I say that this is annoying. I'm not in a >>> position to demand a solution, but I could really need some help. >>> >>> Thanks to Roland the webmailer is online again at least. >>> >>> Now what can I do to help you (=whoever knows Squirrelmail and IMAP >>> well >>> enough) sort out the EXPUNGE-bug? >> >> A patch was already posted on this very thread. Please let us know if >> it does or does not help. > > just tried the patch, no difference. UPDATE: when disabling the line 'sqimap_mailbox_select($imapConnection, $mailbox);', everything works even without the patch. Why is this statement needed? Next line the replied-to message is fetched but also with specifying the mailbox: '$reply_message = sqimap_get_message($imapConnection, $reply_id, $mailbox);' Roland. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
