On 9/6/07, Res <res@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Bill Landry wrote: > > > However, replying to the "To:" header is certainly not the default behavior for > > many e-mail clients. Mailman can be set to add a "Reply-To" header, so maybe > > there was some reason why the Squirrel Mail list admin opted not to set this??? > > Pine replies to user as well... > > Just about every mailing list software can have to reply-to set (and is > the norm to use). > > I agree its not a good configuration for lists to reply to "user". > List traffic should stay list traffic and many are annoyed when they > get private replies, through most likely no fault of their own. > > Paul? Can you change this? A couple of us on the team talked about it and unless someone else comes up with a reason not to change it, we plan to make the change this weekend. Thanks, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
