"Dr. Thomas Tensi" <t.tensi@xxxxxx> writes: > It would be interesting why the academic solution is worse. They should > have tested it against more naive approaches... Sometimes a naive approach works better once you stray from the particular test set used to develop something more sophisticated. -- Måns Rullgård _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
