On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Jan Stary <hans@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I understand that you need to e.g. normalize the whole thing, > as opposed to normalizing each piece first and then concating. > But that assumes the individual pieces are well mastered, > e.g. the relative volume of each is what it is supposed to be. I'm assuming it might *not* have been well mastered, and helping them out a bit. > That's the opposite of what you said before: you have one huge file, > so what "every file" do you mean? It means the big file after the cat'ing, not the little ones I start with. > And if you want to process each > of the pieces differently I don't. > why do you have the one huge file? That's the output of the whole process. -- Glenn English ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
