Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-sipping-context-id-requirements-02.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sal,
It's fine for me.
Laura


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salvatore Loreto [mailto:salvatore.loreto@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:30 PM
> To: Liess, Laura
> Cc: sipping@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: I-D 
> Action:draft-loreto-sipping-context-id-requirements-02.txt
> 
> Hi Laura,
> 
> Hadriel's Session-ID describes and propose a solution (moreover that 
> draft does not have an explicit requirement similar to
> the one you are proposing, it provides a solution that fulfil your 
> requirement);
> 
> in the Context-Id we do not describe or propose any solution
> because we want before people agree on the need of a such new 
> mechanism 
> and commit to work together to a solution.
> 
> In the Context-ID draft there is any requirement that states that the 
> mechanism has to be started by a UA,
> in 4.3 Common requirement we only say:
> 
>    REQ1  It must be possible, when establishing a dialog, to specify
>       that it be correlated with one or more already existing dialogs,
>       which dialogs, at the time they were created, did not need to
>       specify that they might be correlated with in the future.
> 
> 
> we do not mandate that it has to be done in UA, it can happen in the 
> B2BUA or in a Proxy.
> Then Req 3 of the same section we say that the mechanism should word 
> also fo non-compliant end device:
> 
>    REQ3  UAs that do not implement the correlation mechanism 
> and, thus,
>       do not understand the correlation information they 
> received should
>       be able to handle the individual SIP dialogs that were 
> supposed to
>       be correlated as well as possible.  That is, the correlation
>       mechanism should not keep them from trying to handle the SIP
>       dialogs.
> 
> 
> So I think that the requirement are enough general to cover also your 
> scenario
> 
> 
> thanks
> /Sal
> 
> L.Liess@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Sal,
> >  
> > What I want is that the dialog correlation method also also works
> > without end devices contribution (for non-compliant end devices).
> > Hadriel's Session-ID ( 5.5.1) fulfills this requirement.  
> >  
> > REQ3 doesn't cover this issue. 
> >
> > Laura  
> >   
> 
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux