Dale Worley wrote:
...<snip>
The question is, that is, it might or might not be a requirement: Does
a dialog have to be specially marked during its establishment in order
for another, later, dialog to correlate with it?
I don't think it might be a requirement, it seems to be more a technical
solution issue
the requirement have only to say that
"it should be possible for a dialog, no matter in what stage it is, to
be correlate
with another one."
Maybe we have to phrase it in a better way. Please feel free to suggest
a text for it!
...<snip>
Actually, I'm talking about another potential requirement: If dialogs A
and B are established, with no indication of correlation between them,
does it need to be possible for a dialog C to establish a correlation
with *both* A and B? (Which will presumably place all 3 dialogs in the
same communication space.)
Now I got it.
actually both the Req 1 the one in the
draft-loreto-sipping-context-id-requirements-01.txt
REQ1: It must be possible to correlate an already existing dialog or
dialogs with a new dialog or dialogs as relating to the same media
session.
and the one in draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01.txt
REQ1: It must be possible to identify a set of dialogs which have a
direct correlation with each other such that they represent the same
SIP session, with as high a probability as possible.
talk about the possibility to establish a correlation between a new dialog
and one or more existing dialogs, no matter it there is already some
correlation among them or not.
Do you think we should be more explicit on this point?
Sal
Dale
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
