On Oct 24, 2016 3:19 PM, "Stephen Smalley" <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We'd also need to move chcat, since it imports seobject. However, on
> that topic, is there any reason to retain chcat? It was created for the
> original discretionary MCS model and I'm not sure it is used anymore by
> anyone.
I am aware of at least one company using chcat. However, I don't know to what extend they rely on it - they use it in their user provisioning scripts.
I don't mind getting rid of it, assuming all its functionality is covered elsewhere. Especially using the tool(s) in unattended scripts.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
_______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
