What were the relevant git hashes? On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/23/2013 08:10 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote: >> On 05/23/2013 03:57 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: >>> Le Thu, 23 May 2013 07:30:18 +0200, Sven Vermeulen >>> <sven.vermeulen@xxxxxxxxx> a ￩crit : >>> >>>> On May 23, 2013 1:09 AM, "Laurent Bigonville" <bigon@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> The last release of policycoreutils is using a function >>>>> (selinux_current_policy_path()) that is only available in Fedora. I >>>>> guess this shouldn't have made upstream. >>>>> >>>>> An idea how this could be sorted for other distributions? >>>> >>>> Please see my answer to Joshua's announcement on the new userspace. >>> >>> Oh thanks, I messed this. >>> >>>> You'll need to add in the function. >>> >>> Well I'm not a big fan of adding function in libraries that are not >>> merged upstream. IIRC eparis told me on IRC that he has not happy with >>> this new functions. >> >> Maybe we should back out the relevant changes and cut another release? I >> agree that it is wrong for an upstream release to have Fedora-specific >> dependencies. >> >> >> >> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing >> list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to >> majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes >> as the message. > Yes this was a mistake. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlGeC/IACgkQrlYvE4MpobO9eQCg4nKtXkiv/rEIaCeDw8bOH0n/ > 9GUAnji3pwYR6v9YeIzyR51Imj6RSWSM > =xXXJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
