Re: checkpolicy is broken (which is not)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel J Walsh wrote:
<snip>>>

Well I will say that I thought the old construct did not make sense,
since we have to declare most objects in the lanquage except for roles.


If SDS hadn't smacked it down I would have deprecated implicit role declaration in the original module compiler so it shouldn't be a surprise that I'm fine with this change. Refpolicy has always declared roles explicitly (a capability that didn't even exist before the module compiler) and if it didn't it was a refpolicy bug.

This will help to find problems in the policy also like people doing

role httpd_t types httpd_t;

Which I have seen in the past.

I just got the new toolchain to work with Fedora policy.


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux