Re: SELinux Policy in OpenSUSE 11.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/19/2010 06:28 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:40 -0800, Justin P. mattock wrote:
alright... policy is up and running
in full enforcement mode:

SELinux status:                 enabled
SELinuxfs mount:                /selinux
Current mode:                   enforcing
Mode from config file:          error (Permission denied)
Policy version:                 24
Policy from config file:        targeted

Process contexts:
Current context:                name:user_r:user_t
Init context:                   unknown (Permission denied)

Since you ran it from user_t, you weren't allowed to see the context of
init.  Can you run pstree -Z as sysadm_t and confirm that processes are
running in the correct context (i.e. that they are not left in sysadm_t
as they were for Alan)?


man I knew to leave the system alone.(let me reinstall).
but yeah I was not able to do a lot of things because I just had not defined them in the policy.

I tried to enable poly-instantiation support(pam_namespace), but
need to look more into that because I never really set it up
with gdm.

You don't really need that unless you want multi-level directories.


so one person on one machine is pointless

Anyways I'm able to boot up, able to
use firefox and evolution. as for anything
else I'm sure just need to define the allow rules.


Now the only real area of interest is
the dbus message pointing to targeted.

I'm guessing dbus was built with a hard wire,
if so this would require rebuilding dbus,
or using anther rpm package built correctly.
(if possible without breaking the system dependencies).

but then again it could be just a boolean.
In any case main thing is full enforcement works
gdm works, nice system I'd have to say.

dbus should just be including whatever path your /etc/dbus-1/system.conf
says to include, and  it should be relative to /etc/selinux/$SELINUXTYPE
from /etc/selinux/config if it has selinux_root_relative="yes" there.

On Fedora, /etc/dbus-1/system.conf says:
  <include if_selinux_enabled="yes"
selinux_root_relative="yes">contexts/dbus_contexts</include>


yeah its the same,which get 's me to beleive it's something
that might be changed in the code of dbus(but could be wrong).

Justin P. Mattock

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux