Re: releasibility in mcstransd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jun 27, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote:

Paul Moore wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2008 9:42:48 am Joshua Brindle wrote:
I think for the time being we should not be importing the updated
mcstrans into fedora. There are still some unanswered questions about
the implementation. We are talking about some of these offline.

Any particular reason why the discussion isn't online? Granted I'm not sure I would have much useful to contribute but I do like hearing about
what is going on and the discussion behind the decisions ...


Oops, I misspoke. The unanswered questions were on list, how to deal with the use of private libsepol types, duplicated functions and missing ebitmap functionality in the library.

Any progress or thoughts on this?

joe

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux