I am adding releasibility support to mcstransd and just wanted to see if there were any comments or complaints to what I'm planning here. Rather than adding a generic prefix mechanism like the CMW encodings I did something specific for releasibility, in setrans.conf: releasibility c100.c128 then encodings look like: s0:~c100 = rel_US s0:~c101 = rel_Texas so a file with s0:c102.c128 would translate to s0:rel_US,rel_Texas. any comments? Does anyone think this is absolutely the wrong approach? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
