On Monday 09 June 2008 4:25:31 pm Joshua Brindle wrote: > I am adding releasibility support to mcstransd and just wanted to see > if there were any comments or complaints to what I'm planning here. > > Rather than adding a generic prefix mechanism like the CMW encodings > I did something specific for releasibility, in setrans.conf: > > releasibility c100.c128 > > then encodings look like: > > s0:~c100 = rel_US > s0:~c101 = rel_Texas > > so a file with s0:c102.c128 would translate to s0:rel_US,rel_Texas. > > any comments? Does anyone think this is absolutely the wrong > approach? Unless there is a reason to do away with the existing CMW convention I think we should probably stick with it for no other reason than it is familiar to users migrating from CMW boxes to SELinux. -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
