Seems reasonable to me unless you want to create a nice new encoding language ;) How would the user process translate, eg, s0:c102.c128, just s0? -Chad > > I am adding releasibility support to mcstransd and just > wanted to see if there were any comments or complaints to > what I'm planning here. > > Rather than adding a generic prefix mechanism like the CMW > encodings I did something specific for releasibility, in setrans.conf: > > releasibility c100.c128 > > then encodings look like: > > s0:~c100 = rel_US > s0:~c101 = rel_Texas > > so a file with s0:c102.c128 would translate to s0:rel_US,rel_Texas. > > any comments? Does anyone think this is absolutely the wrong approach? > > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
