Re: releasibility in mcstransd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Moore wrote:
> On Friday 27 June 2008 9:42:48 am Joshua Brindle wrote:
>> I think for the time being we should not be importing the updated
>> mcstrans into fedora. There are still some unanswered questions about
>> the implementation. We are talking about some of these offline.
> 
> Any particular reason why the discussion isn't online?  Granted I'm not 
> sure I would have much useful to contribute but I do like hearing about 
> what is going on and the discussion behind the decisions ...
> 

Oops, I misspoke. The unanswered questions were on list, how to deal with the use of private libsepol types, duplicated functions and missing ebitmap functionality in the library. 


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux