> > %files > > /usr/local/myAppTopDir/ > > Just a question - any reason in particular why you are using /usr/local > instead of /opt ? > > /usr/local is suppose to be for applications compiled from source on the > machine, /opt is for third party vendor packages (be they rpm or tarball > or whatever) > Before I start, this is my interpretation of what I've read. I'm open to being convinced otherwise, this is just what I've gathered over time. Okay, and go: This isn't really a third party vendor package if its his. In that case its a local package that he is just packaging it for easy distribution on his own systems. Packaging the application for easy internal deployment does not change it from locally installed software to third party software. I'm not saying /opt is not an acceptable location, but at the same time /usr/local/ is just as acceptable. Per the FHS: "The /usr/local hierarchy is for use by the system administrator when installing software locally. It needs to be safe from being overwritten when the system software is updated. It may be used for programs and data that are shareable amongst a group of hosts, but not found in /usr. " [1] "/opt is reserved for the installation of add-on application software packages. " [2] If one was to hold true that anything not provided by the OS belongs in /opt, then one could argue that all of EPEL should be configured for /opt, and back in Fedora Extras days, all of Extras should have been in /opt. When installing into /usr/local/ you do need to make sure that your application is not writing back to anything in that directory space. -greg [1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY [2] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#OPTADDONAPPLICATIONSOFTWAREPACKAGES _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
