Re: ... binary RPM question ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Novick, Randy wrote:

> I understand and appreciate where they come from. I am, however, legally
> bound to not ship our source code, in any form, at any time, to any
> customer, by any vehicle. The cost to the company, were I to do so,
> would be in the billions of dollars, and the cost to my own career would
> be incalculable, to say nothing of my own sense of integrity.

I have never suggested to let the source RPM contain actual source
code, but the input files (in your case tarballs with binaries)
are tagged "Source".   The recommendation is to always create source
RPMs, even when the "sources" are in fact the binaries.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux