Re: ... binary RPM question ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:28:38AM -0700, Leland Ray wrote:

> If you are not using %prep (as itself, or as %setup),
> the Source: tags only exist to tell rpmbuild what to
> use when constructing a .src.rpm.
> 
> So the simple answer to the question is that there are
> no source files in the case of constructing a binary
> rpm; you already have the binaries, and the previous
> build system gives you the layout.

Building a binary RPM without a source RPM (in this case meaning an
RPM containing a tarball with binaries) is in general a bad idea,
as rebuilding the (binary) RPM is not posisble then.

Using files from outside the SOURCES directory is just "not done"
when building RPMs and that what's happening here.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux