Re: Supported Linux Versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, Apr 19th 2007 at 21:16 +0200, quoth Tony Earnshaw:

=>[...]
=>
=>> It is more important to follow the FHS and LSB and to install into the
=>> correct locations than to release a generic tar.gz file.
=>
=>Actually, Bob, you could just have started at, and finished, here.

My last gig was for a company that solved the problem by rolling all known 
package formats for their product. My task was to take their software and 
roll it up into rpm, deb, pkg, etc for every possible type of packaging 
system. Tar files are universal (sort of), but the point was that people 
want their software to be delivered in the packaging format that's native 
to the system it gets installed on.

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux