On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 21:57 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Friday, 13 January 2006, at 06:23:49 (-0800), > Michael A. Peters wrote: > > > I would not be opposed to an official macro name in LSB to use for that. > > Given that the RPM author doesn't think it's a good solution, I doubt > LSB will adopt it. It certainly has its drawbacks. Where it would be useful - if the packager has decided they are going to use a dist tag - let the macro they use for it be standard. _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
