Circa 2005-06-01 dixit seth vidal: : > Sure, bit I want someshit-config to be included in the RPM. I guess : > it's up to me to draw the line between the number of packages and the : > functionality of each package, and what each package is capable of. I : > just wanted to make sure that I was on the right track here. : : and what we're saying is that if someshit-config, called from %post has : to have user interaction then it WILL break when someone installs the : package using a tool that doesn't have console access. What you write, Seth, is correct. However, dant's original post had to do with automating the configuration process within a %post scriptlet; he proposed using expect for that purpose, to which i suggested the possibility of a here document instead. You seem to have been reading a different conversation than the one i've been involved in.... -- jim knoble | jmknoble@xxxxxxxxx | http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/ (GnuPG fingerprint: 809F:09B9:9686:D035:4AB0::9455:124B:0A62:DD6A:76D6) ..................................................................... :"The methods now being used to merchandise the political candidate : : as though he were a deodorant positively guarantee the electorate : : against ever hearing the truth about anything." --Aldous Huxley : :...................................................................:
