Re: %postin hackery, passing arguments to post-install script/program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Circa 2005-06-01 dixit seth vidal:

: On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 17:42 -0400, Jim Knoble wrote:
: > Circa 2005-06-01 dixit Paul Nasrat:
: > 
: > : And what happens if someone uses a non rpm cli to do the install
: > : (rpmlib) potentially via a gui, or via kickstart.
: > 
: > Then the postinstall script runs, and somecommand runs and gets its
: > input programmatically from a here document or an expect script and ...
: > it's the same no matter what method is used to install the package
: > (apart from rpm2cpio).
: > 
: > : rpm installs are designed to be non-interactive.  Instead write a config
: > : program users can use post install.
: > 
: > That's what this whole conversation has been about.  You obviously
: > haven't been paying attention.
: 
: he doesn't mean %post install.
: 
: he means after the whole transaction is done.

Whom do you mean by "he"?  Paul Nasrat (a responder), or dant (the
original poster)?  dant put in his subject "%postin hackery", by which
it seems fairly obvious he means a %post scriptlet, which is the
situation that i was addressing.  dant, care to clarify?

-- 
jim knoble  |  jmknoble@xxxxxxxxx  |  http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/
(GnuPG fingerprint: 809F:09B9:9686:D035:4AB0::9455:124B:0A62:DD6A:76D6)
 .....................................................................
 :"The methods now being used to merchandise the political candidate :
 : as though he were a deodorant positively guarantee the electorate :
 : against ever hearing the truth about anything."   --Aldous Huxley :
 :...................................................................:


[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux