On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 15:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Maximum RPM, which you refer to, was never a great book when it was new. And > despite some updating, it's still not that great. I guess this is one > example. I think that's a bit harsh, particularly for those contributors who are (slowly) trying to maintain an open content reference for RPM - you could always send a patch to correct the text, or discuss specific issues you have with the corpus. Thanks Paul _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
