On Wednesday, 05 May 2004, at 15:13:00 (-0700), Steve Beattie wrote: > Except that I've seen *Red Hat* ship srpms on multiple occasions > that were broken in this way -- there was no way the supposed source > rpm would build, and yet they had a binary rpm of the same > version. It's not the user I'm concerned about, it's the > distributer. I don't recall excluding any particular entity from my previous statement. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@xxxxxxxxx> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "The first lesson reading teaches is how to be alone." -- Jonathan Franzen _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
