On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:24:27PM -0700, Laughlin, Joseph V wrote: > That's what I figured. Still kinda inconvient though. Actually, quite the opposite -- what would be inconvenient would be for a package to appear to build perfectly fine, but be missing files that you assumed would be there. [ps -- please don't top-post. it makes it hard for multiple people to discuss a topic. for example, now the context is gone.] -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
