Re: Building RPMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:32:07PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Actually, quite the opposite -- what would be inconvenient would be for a
> package to appear to build perfectly fine, but be missing files that you
> assumed would be there.

What's unfortunate is that rpmbuild -bs and -bb exist, as this allows
buggy srpms to be built and shipped that don't correspond to the binary
rpms.

-- 
Steve Beattie                               Don't trust programmers?
<steve@xxxxxxxxx>                         Complete StackGuard distro at
http://NxNW.org/~steve/                            immunix.org
        http://www.sardonix.org -- Audit code, earn respect.

Attachment: pgp00062.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux