On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:18:03AM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Yes, I'm sure. NoSource: ain't exactly a high priority for OSS, > at odds with many rpm and Red Hat goals, so I've never bothered to > change a thing with NoSource: as originally implemented. Sorry, but I found evidence of the opposite. In August 1998 I made a package where I put in the spec file: NoSource: 1, 2, 3 And this really worked, as I just compared the src.rpm and nosrc.rpm files that I both saved and the 3 source files are really not included! It is an RPM v3 package, according to "file". For anyone wondering what package this was: it was "xanim" where I made a private version with these 3 binary files included: Source1: ftp://xanim.va.pubnix.com/modules/xa1.0_cyuv_linuxELF.o.Z Source2: ftp://xanim.va.pubnix.com/modules/xa2.0_cvid_linuxELF.o.Z Source3: ftp://xanim.va.pubnix.com/modules/xa2.0_iv32_linuxELF.o.Z ;-) Cheers, -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
