Re: does the Nosource directive work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:59:28PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:12:57AM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 
> > > Be warned: specifying multiple source #'s on one NoSource line
> > > is broken since a long time: see my bug #77915.
> > 
> > Broken? Never implemented is closer to the truth.
> 
> Sure?  I'm pretty that at a certain moment an existing spec file
> I had didn't work anymore, after it had worked before.  Pretty sure,
> but not 100% sure, to be honest...
> 

Yes, I'm sure. NoSource: ain't exactly a high priority for OSS,
at odds with many rpm and Red Hat goals, so I've never bothered to
change a thing with NoSource: as originally implemented.

Hint: the patch is trivial if you *really* wanted the problem fixed.

73 de Jeff

-- 
Jeff Johnson	ARS N3NPQ
jbj@xxxxxxxxxx (jbj@xxxxxxx)
Chapel Hill, NC


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux