-----Original Message----- From: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gerry Doris Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:05 AM To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: e-mail etiquette > Both you and Glenn have a reason for wanting to top post...fine. Others do it because they'd rather be different even if it is confusing. It takes all kinds! Gerry -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list Some of us are just too confused to know what's happening. I have to have Outlook in this position so I can forward a formatted message without the > marks. I tried to find the setting to change it back and forth, but no luck. If I post on top, I try to make it a sentence that makes a complete statement by itself. Nothing wrong in my opinion with a top post that refers a reader to a URL or makes a quick statement. I just have to be tolerant of all but it is easier for me if most messages are top posted unless there are several answers scattered, then, answer under (or beside) the appropriate reference. Just 2c worth from the confused sector. ;^) Buck -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
