From: "Buck" <RHList@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Both you and Glenn have a reason for wanting to top post...fine. Others
> > do it because they'd rather be different even if it is confusing. It
> > takes all kinds!
> Some of us are just too confused to know what's happening.
>
> I have to have Outlook in this position so I can forward a formatted
> message without the > marks. I tried to find the setting to change it
> back and forth, but no luck. If I post on top, I try to make it a
> sentence that makes a complete statement by itself. Nothing wrong in my
> opinion with a top post that refers a reader to a URL or makes a quick
> statement.
>
> I just have to be tolerant of all but it is easier for me if most
> messages are top posted unless there are several answers scattered,
> then, answer under (or beside) the appropriate reference.
>
> Just 2c worth from the confused sector.
Basically I am against the whole rant. It wastes bandwidth. It's silly.
It's a collection of little children whining. Rant against things that
are dangerous, like RTF and HTML bearing E-Mail. But getting so nit
picky that you argue about top, bottom, or interspersed posting is
silly.
{^_^}
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
