Re: Just some redhat musings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Waterson wrote:

> But what of the little guy? The guy who decided to throw his lot
> in by developing applications for linux freely, in the hope that
> he will be able to freely have access to linux just as he has made
> his application freely available for redhat to bundle with its OS.

> With the advent of enterprise level RedHat products, can we expect
> the community to still give freely of their time to fix and test
> RedHat products, or, does RedHat adopt the tried and tested MS model
> of testing its products on those who purchase it?

I understand what you mean. But the target of the GPL (the license under
which most Linux software is published) is not to provide software free
of charge. Instead you are getting the code for free, and you may change
and distribute it freely! One example: You can download all the source
RPMs of RHEL *for free*, compile them yourself, burn them onto CD and
*sell* these CDs! Of course you cannot call them Red Hat (or any other
trademark). When you look at other Linux companies you don't always get
that freedom: Red Hat releases the source code for *all* their
distributed software! When Red Hat bought Cygwin they put the
proprietary Cygwin software under the GPL and published the source code!
S.u.S.E on the other hand releases most of their self-developed software
under a license which prohibits most of the use of it.

What some persons on this list (myself included) are complaining about
is this: With RHL until 7.3 you got a very stable distro and updates for
a long period of time for a very affordable price. This made RHL very
attractive for small businesses and simple servers. With the
discontinuation of RHL this part of the market is no longer supported by
Red Hat, instead I would have to go either for Fedora Core (free of
charge, but only 9 months of updates - I need at least the double time,
better more - and the software may not be as stable and tested as I'm
used to) which is fine for home users, or for RHEL which will provide
the stability and long-term updates support I need, but is too expensive
for my needs. Currently Red Hat's product portfolio is missing a
mid-priced and mid-supported distro, which before was RHL. I need a very
stable distro for my servers, and I cannot reinstall (and validate! a
two-month procedure!) every half a year. So Fedora Core is not an option
for me. RHEL would be nice, but is too expensive (and provides more
support than I need). Either Red Hat gets out a mid-range product
*soon*, or I need to switch my servers to another OS.

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/
Red Hat Linux 8.0 for low memory: http://www.rule-project.org/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux