-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:13:51 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote: > Actually, I think Fedora might still be an affordable answer. The > difference is that you would get an RHN subscription for Fedora updates. > That should not cost more than about $90 to $100 per year, worst case. $60 for a normal RHN account. It hasn't changed, has it? > You also would then have access to all of the Fedora 3rd party > repositories. Probably not all, but just Core, Extras and Updates. > Since you don't need support, you should be able to get most all of what > you need from the community. The only additional "cost" of Fedora is > that you will be upgrading your system roughly twice per year. Or not. We'll see. - -- Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/ev280iMVcrivHFQRAqomAJ9AISxCBxmk5TDbmnpBj5rNIDERoACcCFbJ 5RcJvInupZ8BEqcS4VLY5EY= =8lUt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
